Monthly Archives: October 2011
The 10 Major Causes of Leadership Failure
Excerpt from the book “Think and Grow Rich” By Napolean Hill
[1] Inability to Organize Details
[2] Unwillingness to render humble service
[3] Expectation of Pay for what they “Know” Instead of what they Do with what they know
[4] Fear of Competition from followers
[5] Lack of imagination
[6] Selfishness
[7] Intemperance
[8] Disloyalty
[9] Emphasis on the “Authority” of Leadership
[10] Emphasis of Title
CSFST Framework for Captives / Near Captive Units – Part 6
Refer to Part 1 of this series…
In this post, details of the multiple sub-dimensions of T – Talent Acquisition and Development are elaborated.
Extracted from the paper “Crossing the Chasm : Indian Captives / Near Captive Units” published by Nischala Murthy & Rahul Chaubey under the guidance of Prof J Ramachandran, IIMB
CSFST Framework for Captives / Near Captive Units – Part 5
Refer to Part 1 of this series…
In this post, details of the multiple sub-dimensions of S – Systems and Processes are elaborated.
Extracted from the paper “Crossing the Chasm : Indian Captives / Near Captive Units” published by Nischala Murthy & Rahul Chaubey under the guidance of Prof J Ramachandran, IIMB
CSFST Framework for Captives / Near Captive Units – Part 4
Refer to Part 1 of this series…
In this post, details of the multiple sub-dimensions of F – Financials are elaborated.
Extracted from the paper “Crossing the Chasm : Indian Captives / Near Captive Units” published by Nischala Murthy & Rahul Chaubey under the guidance of Prof J Ramachandran, IIMB
CSFST Framework for Captives / Near Captive Units – Part 3
Refer to Part 1 of this series…
In this post, details of the multiple sub-dimensions of S – Strategic Orientation are elaborated.
Extracted from the paper “Crossing the Chasm : Indian Captives / Near Captive Units” published by Nischala Murthy & Rahul Chaubey under the guidance of Prof J Ramachandran, IIMB
CSFST Framework for Captives / Near Captive Units – Part 2
Refer to Part 1 of this series…
In this post, details of the multiple sub-dimensions of C – Customer Development and Engagement are elaborated.
Extracted from the paper “Crossing the Chasm : Indian Captives / Near Captive Units” published by Nischala Murthy & Rahul Chaubey under the guidance of Prof J Ramachandran, IIMB
CSFST Framework for Captives / Near Captive Units – Part 1
The CSFST framework was developed as the basis for analysis of Indian Captive / Near Captive units.
A Captive Unit refers to a fully owned subsidiary [A subsidiary is a company controlled by another company or corporation, called its parent (or parent organization) which is usually the corporate headquarters] in India. Usually, this unit is dependent on the parent organization for its business, revenues and potential growth. Typically, the parent organization is also the only customer for this unit. In essence, the present and future of this Captive Unit are driven by the parent/customer entity.
An Indian Captive Unit (CU) is a company which has been set-up in India to cater to specific requirements [say IT] of the company head quartered any where across the globe. The primary business of the global major may be IT related (Eg: IBM, Accenture, Google, Yahoo) or non-IT like Banking, Insurance, etc. (Eg: UBS, HSBC, GE). Almost 100% of the business and revenues are obtained from a single customer (also usually the parent).
An Indian IT Near-Captive Unit (NCU) is a company which is registered and head quartered in India; and provides IT services to customers world wide. However a significant portion (>50%) of the business and revenues are obtained from a single customer. This is synonymous with any Indian Independent Software Vendor (ISV) who has a high client concentration [Client concentration is the industry terminology which refers to what percentage of revenue is derived from a particular customer. A company which has 70% revenues from a single customer has a high client concentration; in contrast a company which has 10% revenues from a single customer has lower client concentration]
CSFST framework has 5 dimensions as listed below:
1) Customer Development and Engagement
2) Strategic Orientation
3) Financial
4) Systems and Processes
5) Talent Acquisition and Development
The CSFST framework is depicted below:

These dimensions form the critical determinants in the growth of a Captive / Near Captive. Each of these 5 dimensions has sub-categories to capture the finer aspects of each of these broad areas for any organization. An organization can face issues along any one/more dimension(s). The ideal utopian state would be to resolves all these issues by developing creative and adequate solutions.
In the next series of blog posts, each of these dimensions are elaborated further.
Extracted from the paper “Crossing the Chasm : Indian Captives / Near Captive Units” published by Nischala Murthy & Rahul Chaubey under the guidance of Prof J Ramachandran, IIMB
Technology Maturity V/s Payment Solution Maturity Matrix
The Technology – Payment Maturity Matrix has been conceptualized to indicate and infer the potential risks associated with an emerging payment innovation
Technology Maturity refers to the stage of evolution and maturity of the technology.
Payment Solution Maturity refers to the ‘newness’ of a payment solution and how much time is required for the solution to become stable and be widely accepted.
From the above matrix, it is evident that the risks associated with a new payment solution based on a new technology are very high. The nascency of a technology only increases the risks associated with the commercialization of a payment solution. On the other hand, if a payment innovation utilizes an existing stable technology; the associated risks would be lower. Combining an existing payment solution with an existing technology so as to cater to a specific customer need (speed for example) has a low level of risk
Extracted from the paper “Retail Payment Systems” published by the author under the guidance of Prof. P.C.Narayan
Key Considerations for New Technology Adoption in Payment Solutions
With the plethora of technologies available to support the latest payment innovations, it
becomes important to bear in mind the following considerations :
1) Impact of technology on consumer experience
2) Investments required by all players in the payment value chain for implementing the payment solution
3) Return on Investment for all the players in the payment value chain
4) Risks associated with technology
5) Maturity of the technology
6) Stage of Commercialization of the technology
7) Maturity of the payment solution
While technology plays a key role in the payment solution space, it must be remembered
that technology itself is not a panacea. A technology solution must address a distinct set
of requirements which are focused on solving the needs of customers, merchants and
financial institutions.
Extracted from the paper “Retail Payment Systems” published by the author under the guidance of Prof. P.C.Narayan









